<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight Character Passwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/10/19/eight-character-passwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/10/19/eight-character-passwords/</link>
	<description>Ugh, Stacy's talking again...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/10/19/eight-character-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=432#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Doug: MD5 has been parallelized.  Just google parallel MD5.  Also, have a look here:
http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/sigcomm95.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug: MD5 has been parallelized.  Just google parallel MD5.  Also, have a look here:<br />
<a href="http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/sigcomm95.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/sigcomm95.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/10/19/eight-character-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=432#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I think it would be hard to parallelize MD5.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Md5

Hard, but not impossible. I think that forensics guys are looking at this, since they have to run MD5&#039;s for hard drives, and that takes time. If you stripe them then you can at least parallelize the MD5&#039;s of the stripes. I guess.

But yes, I&#039;m sure there are some agencies that have exactly such a database. I hadn&#039;t really thought about how easy it was until I read your post. Of course they&#039;ve done this. That&#039;s just walking-around money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be hard to parallelize MD5.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Md5" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Md5</a></p>
<p>Hard, but not impossible. I think that forensics guys are looking at this, since they have to run MD5&#8217;s for hard drives, and that takes time. If you stripe them then you can at least parallelize the MD5&#8217;s of the stripes. I guess.</p>
<p>But yes, I&#8217;m sure there are some agencies that have exactly such a database. I hadn&#8217;t really thought about how easy it was until I read your post. Of course they&#8217;ve done this. That&#8217;s just walking-around money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
