<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Idea / Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Ugh, Stacy&#039;s talking again...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:17:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=350#comment-122</guid>
		<description>@Marek Lisp isnt strongly typed; its strongly untyped. Python is weakly typed. ML is strongly typed. Scala is strongly typed. I&#039;m with you on erasure. I mean, WTF???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marek Lisp isnt strongly typed; its strongly untyped. Python is weakly typed. ML is strongly typed. Scala is strongly typed. I&#8217;m with you on erasure. I mean, WTF???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Kubica</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Kubica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=350#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Strong or Weak Typing: All mentioned languages are strongly typed. You probably mean static or dynamic typing.

Plus, I do not see in which case Type Erasure is a good thing. When I see what weird things the Scala folks did to preserve the type information, it just gets ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong or Weak Typing: All mentioned languages are strongly typed. You probably mean static or dynamic typing.</p>
<p>Plus, I do not see in which case Type Erasure is a good thing. When I see what weird things the Scala folks did to preserve the type information, it just gets ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=350#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Generally the programming is dangerous in the hands of a novice. Each programmer must know what he/she is doing. Otherwise it is dangerous - not matter what language is used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally the programming is dangerous in the hands of a novice. Each programmer must know what he/she is doing. Otherwise it is dangerous &#8211; not matter what language is used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://stacyprowell.com/blog/2009/08/21/good-idea-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacyprowell.com/blog/?p=350#comment-63</guid>
		<description>LISP macros rock, C macros suck. LISP macros are LISP, C macros are crazy preprocessor crap with line continuation characters. Just say no to preprocessors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LISP macros rock, C macros suck. LISP macros are LISP, C macros are crazy preprocessor crap with line continuation characters. Just say no to preprocessors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

